COACHING MANAGEMENT · FEE ADMINISTRATION

Coaching Fee Collection Daily Closing: A Practical Checklist

A disciplined end-of-day process for reconciling coaching fee receipts, payment evidence, adjustments and unresolved differences.

CPXOverviewEnquiriesBatchesFeesReports
CodePex CampusFee administrationCourse and batch context
Fee structuresStructure
Installment scheduleReview
Outstanding duesRecords
Fee administration
Fee structuresProgramme-specific contextStructure
Installment scheduleReview due and receipt recordsReview
Outstanding duesFollow the relevant balanceRecords

Conceptual product view · no customer records or performance figures

THE SHORT ANSWER

Daily fee closing compares collections recorded for the day with the authorised receipts and payment evidence, then investigates differences before totals are treated as final. Separate cash, bank or gateway context where applicable, check reversals and adjustments, and ensure each receipt is attributable to the right learner and fee obligation. The centre remains responsible for accounting policy and payment-provider reconciliation.

01 / COLLECTION WINDOW

Agree the business date and the transactions included in the close.

Define the cut-off time and how late-evening or backdated collections are handled. A payment received after the day closes may belong to a different settlement period even if it appears in the system later. State which staff member owns the close and who reviews it.

Separate the date a learner paid from the date funds settle in a bank account. These are not always the same, especially for digital channels. Record the chosen period so another person can reproduce the comparison.

02 / RECEIPT COMPLETENESS

Check each collection against a learner and an authorised obligation.

Verify the learner identity, fee period or instalment and amount before treating a receipt as complete. Confirm whether the entry is a full payment, partial payment or advance under the centre’s policy. The same amount can represent different obligations for different learners.

Check that a receipt reference is unique and that corrections follow an authorised process. Avoid replacing or deleting the original context to make the day’s total appear correct; preserve the history needed to explain an adjustment.

03 / PAYMENT-MODE TOTALS

Compare recorded categories to the evidence each channel provides.

For cash, compare recorded receipts with the controlled cash count and handover. For bank or digital payments, compare the available transaction reference and settlement information with the collection entry. Use only the payment types the centre actually accepts and the evidence available to it.

Do not assume that a payment gateway’s gross transaction total equals the amount deposited; fees, timing, refunds or reversals may affect settlement. Keep provider statements and system reports distinct until the reconciliation basis is clear.

04 / ADJUSTMENTS & EXCEPTIONS

Investigate shortfalls and overages before posting a correction.

Review duplicate entries, reversals, concessions, waivers and amount mismatches under the institution’s approval policy. Confirm who authorised a concession or correction and what evidence supports it. An unexplained difference is an open issue, not an invitation to alter a receipt.

Record the exception, owner and next review date. Where funds are involved, follow the centre’s finance control and escalation route. Software records can help organise the investigation but do not replace independent cash custody or accounting review.

05 / CLOSE & HANDOVER

Prepare a concise summary without exposing unnecessary learner details.

Share the day’s totals by appropriate payment category, the number of receipts and the unresolved exceptions with the authorised reviewer. Keep learner-level details in a restricted view; a broad group message rarely needs names or balances.

Assign cash or document handover using the institute’s established controls. If a product report is exported, protect the file and remove temporary copies according to policy. Confirm exactly how receipt numbers and report filters behave before relying on an export as the final close.

06 / PERIODIC RECONCILIATION

Compare daily closes with bank settlement and the monthly ledger process.

A daily close checks operational completeness, while a bank reconciliation compares deposits, settlement dates and statement entries. They answer related but different questions. Escalate unresolved gateway or bank differences to the person responsible for finance rather than forcing a daily match.

Review recurring exceptions to improve collection instructions, receipt discipline or staff training. Keep the close proportionate and consistent; a short reliable control is more useful than a large report nobody owns.

A FIELD GUIDE FOR YOUR TEAM

A coaching fee daily close

Use this at the end of a collection day, adapting payment categories to the channels the institute actually accepts.

LensQuestion to askWhat to record
COLLECTION WINDOWAgree the business date and the transactions included in the close.A clear business date, cut-off and responsible reviewer.
RECEIPT COMPLETENESSCheck each collection against a learner and an authorised obligation.A receipt list with learner, obligation, amount and reference checked.
PAYMENT-MODE TOTALSCompare recorded categories to the evidence each channel provides.Separate totals by channel with the relevant source evidence.
ADJUSTMENTS & EXCEPTIONSInvestigate shortfalls and overages before posting a correction.An exception log with evidence, approver and accountable owner.
CLOSE & HANDOVERPrepare a concise summary without exposing unnecessary learner details.A reviewed summary and documented hand-off to the next authorised role.
PERIODIC RECONCILIATIONCompare daily closes with bank settlement and the monthly ledger process.A periodic settlement check and one improvement to the collection process.

CODEPEX IN CONTEXT

Useful guidance begins with clear scope.

Campus declares fee records and collection reporting areas; verify exact payment modes, receipt controls, refunds, gateway settlement and exports in the product. Do not claim automated bank reconciliation or accounting compliance without evidence.

Product-specific statements are based on the current owner-controlled capability declaration. Ask CodePex to confirm any institution-specific configuration or unlisted requirement.